How to structure a compare-and-contrast essay
At the time, I was President Johnsons appointments secretary, the position that has since evolved into the White House chief of staff. Right after the 1968 results came in, the president put me in charge of organizing a transition process, something that had never been done. Nixon is an ., but hes the only president well have, Johnson told me. I want him and all of his team to be fully prepared to govern after the Inauguration at 12 noon on January 20. The following is offered as a far more potent multiplier, on Keynesian grounds even more potent and effective than the investment multiplier, and on Keynesian grounds there can be no objection to it. It is a reductio ad absurdum, but it is not simply a parody, for it is in keeping with the Keynesian method. If past experience is an indication of future outcomes, then someone who doesnt ask too many questions, yet has an interest in climate change, could be a good candidate. The name that keeps coming up in news headlines looks to be Fed Governor Lael Brainard. CNBC reports: Once youve settled on your subjects, you can begin generating ideas. It helps to first list all the similarities and differences between your subjects. When you see them all written down, you can start formulating connections and decide what structure to use for your compare-and-contrast essay.
Only then can we help working people understand that they do not live in a meritocracy, that their intuition that the system is rigged is correct (but it is not by those whom they had been taught to blame) and that their pain and rage is legitimate. Youve voted to reduce your liberties. To narrow the range of people entitled to justice and equality before the law. To live in a place where the police should not be criticized; where fighting political correctness is more important than fighting racism; where Muslims are suspected and people who appear Hispanic can be rounded up if theyre not carrying their papers. What we do know is that Canadas three main national political parties (Liberals, Conservatives, and the New Democratic Party [NDP]), all leftist, are concerned that the three-year-old PPC increased its share of the popular vote by more than threefold in just twenty-three months. They should be concerned. A rising PPC on the right may not bode well for Canadas bipartisan leftist politics, because Bernier, who is not a rookie, is well versed in libertarianism. The second scenario requires Democrats to put their status quo political model to rest.
How to start a compare and contrast essay example - Until now, our Americophilia has been unrequited. Then in August, Donald J. Trump declared himself Mr. Brexit. For Mr. Trump and his supporters, Britains vote in June to leave the European Union was evidence of a growing popular revolt against multiculturalism, porous borders and political elites. If the British electorate could deliver a result that baffled its financial sector, its scientists and metropolitan liberals and was not widely predicted by pollsters couldnt the same sort of upset happen in America?
Undeterred (what else was he supposed to be?), President Obama nominated Merrick Garland, a seasoned judge praised in the past by Republicans like Senator Orrin Hatch. A debate ensued over historical facts, which seems quaintly polite in retrospect. Since 1900, had the Senate ever refused to confirm a nominee in a presidential election year as a result of the impending election? The answer was no (even if Mr. Cruz tried to argue, against the facts, that Justice Anthony Kennedy wasnt confirmed in the election year of 1988. ) The Republicans refusal to grant Judge Garland a hearing or schedule a vote was in fact unprecedented. A businessman's new investment in a longer and more physically productive process will therefore be made from a sheaf of processes previously known but unusable because of the time-preference limitation. A lowering of time preferences and of the pure interest rate will signify an expansion of saved capital at the disposal of investors and therefore an expansion of the longer processes, the time limitation on investment having been weakened. I got up on Election Day and burst into tears not a genteel twin trickle but a great heaving burst, zero to firehose. Tears spattered the inside of my glasses, dripped from my lips, and left mascara-tinged rosettes blooming black in my cereal milk. Next comes the question of how many additional Supreme Court appointments will come his way.
V. How to Write a compare and contrast essay - Yet under the current mainstream narrative, hiking interest rates is what must be done to fight price increases. Despite high food prices in Turkey, its Central Bank explains the rationale for cutting rates by 1:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83. Anthony Kennedy is 80. Stephen Breyer is 78. In Supreme Court terms, four years is a long time. If the writing in your compare-and-contrast essay starts getting messy, Grammarlys writing suggestions recommend alternative phrasings to clear things up. Just one click and your writing gets the professional editor treatment. Try Grammarly now and see how your writing improves. Sometimes the assignment gives you the freedom to choose a topic at your pleasure. In this case, you may be bewildered by what to compare. Almost anything can be contrasted, but few comparisons can raise a vivid interest. The tulip market in 1630s Holland, then, was multitiered, with select broken bulbs being traded for many hundreds, even thousands, of times the value of ordinary tulip bulbsuntil, that is, the two months spanning late 1636 and early 1637, which saw twenty- to thirtyfold increases in the price of standard tulips, which had traded weeks before at the equivalent of tenths of a cent per handful. Democrats need to become as conscious and articulate about the suffering caused by classism as we are about other forms of suffering. We need to reach out to Trump voters in a spirit of empathy and contrition.
They already had a significant portion of the nonwhite minority vote locked up, but have lost too many working-class white people. Bernie Sanders might not have won over the wealthier whites who were voting with Trump against the seemingly rising tide of minorities, but he might have snared the white working class and some of the white middle class. In this election youve revealed that your people like Russians, Hungarians, Iraqis, Iranians and others whose politics you normally look down on will choose a narrow, nonsensical nationalist ethos when they feel threatened by uncertainty. Your imperial outreach allowed you to experience other cultures, but now youve chosen to shrink your outlook, with the expectation that the world will continue to revolve around you. It wont. Mr. Trump was supposed to be the bucket of cold water that aroused the sleeping giant, producing not only a stronger preference for the Democratic candidate but also, more important, a spike in turnout. In 2012, with immigration reform on the line, more than 12 million Latino voters stayed home, producing a turnout rate of 48 percent compared with 64 percent for whites and 67 percent for blacks. Political scientists and cultural commentators will long debate what happened in this election, to this woman and to many women. The question is whether the image of Mrs.
Mr. Trump is the exact opposite of Mr. Obama. His baseline is worse, for starters: to establish expectations for his presidency, you have to factor in his hugely irresponsible fiscal policy, potential trade wars and maybe even reckless brinkmanship over repaying the national debt. Put those things together, and a severe recession becomes possible. That sickness is imperialism. America is an imperial country, and its decay might now be showing. The power that has brought so much benefit to the country for white people is now faltering in its ability to provide those benefits to all white people. The empires best hope is to be more inclusive, demographically and economically, but that runs counter to the imperial impulse to hoard power and profit. A compare-and-contrast essay is a style of essay that points out the similarities and differences between two or more subjects. Its ideal for showing what separates and unites related things or concepts, particularly if the subjects are often confused for each other or unjustly lumped together.